What is generally the aim of strategies focused on negating or counterattacking the enemy?

The aim of strategies focused on negating or counterattacking the enemy is fundamentally to deny the enemy's intentions. This involves disrupting their plans and capabilities to execute their objectives, effectively countering their moves and maintaining the initiative. By denying the enemy's intentions, a force can undermine their operational effectiveness and prevent them from achieving their strategic goals.

This approach is closely aligned with the principles of maneuver warfare, which emphasize agility, speed, and disrupting the enemy's decision-making cycle. The essence of counterattacking lies in the ability to exploit weaknesses in the enemy's position while simultaneously protecting one's own objectives. When successful, such strategies can lead to a significant shift in the balance of power on the battlefield, allowing for strategic advantages.

The other choices do not encapsulate the core intent of these strategies. Achieving overwhelming numerical superiority focuses on resource augmentation rather than tactical denial of the enemy’s actions. Establishing a defensive line might be part of a broader plan but does not specifically address the act of counteracting the enemy's intentions. Maximizing troop morale is essential for effective military operations, but it is not the primary focus of negating or counterattacking the enemy itself.